ARKADIUSZ JANISZEWSKI
Automating the administrative burden to reclaim decision-making energy.
SCHEDULE GENERATOR / DECISION SILUMATOR / OKR / STAKEHOLDERS
Introduction: The Hidden Leak
As I prepare for upcoming project challenges, I asked myself one critical question: "Which tasks drain my decision-making energy before I even get to the real strategy?" The answer was clear. It wasn't the complex engineering problems or the offshore logistics. It was the administrative friction. The invisible grind that happens before the real work begins.
The Enemy: Cognitive Drag
In every project, there is a "Cognitive Drag"—the energy wasted on setting up the framework rather than executing within it. I identified four specific areas where this friction paralyzes a Manager:
-
The Blank Canvas Paralysis: Fighting with blank spreadsheet cells to create a schedule from scratch.
-
Analysis Paralysis: Staring at 50/50 decisions without a framework to break the tie.
-
Vague Objectives: Trying to translate soft wishes into concrete OKRs manually.
-
Political Fog: Navigating complex stakeholder networks without a map.
The Tool: System Upgrade
Instead of working harder or hiring more administrative support, I chose to upgrade the Operating System. I expanded the SiteAI ecosystem with four new assistants designed specifically for project management hygiene. The goal was simple: Automate the "Setup" to focus on the "Execution."
The Analysis: Automatig The Foundation
Here is how the automated agents handle the heavy lifting and what specific questions they force me to answer:
01. The Schedule Generator Instead of spending hours formatting cells in Excel, the agent generates a logical phase structure in seconds based on the project scope. It creates the skeleton, allowing me to focus on the muscles (resources and buffers).
-
Key Questions: Does the timeline respect the natural sequence of installation? Where are the invisible dependencies? Is the Critical Path defined by logic or wishful thinking?
02. The Decision Simulator (Pre-mortem) When facing a tough call, the system doesn't just give advice. It runs a simulation. It projects three distinct timelines: Optimistic, Realistic, and Critical. It allows me to see the consequences of a decision before I make it.
-
Key Questions: What is the absolute worst-case scenario and can we survive it? What data point would force us to abort this decision? Are we optimizing for speed or safety?
03. The OKR Generator The system acts as a translator. It takes vague inputs like "improve communication" and forces them into concrete metrics. It removes the ambiguity that usually leads to team frustration later in the project.
-
Key Questions: How will we mathematically prove we succeeded? Is this Objective actionable or just aspirational? What is the binary "Pass/Fail" criteria?
04. The Stakeholder Map Projects don't fail because of steel; they fail because of people. The agent maps the key players, their influence, and their interest levels, preventing last-minute political surprises.
-
Key Questions: Who has the power to stop the project but no interest in its success? Who are the hidden influencers? Who loses if we win?
THE RESULT: OPERATIONAL HYGIENE
This isn't just about productivity. It is about hygiene. By automating these four areas, I ensure that from Day 1, my attention is focused on the people and the project success, not on the administrative noise. The machine handles the data. The human handles the strategy.
ARKADIUSZ JANISZEWSKI
LIVE INTELLIGENCE
This site is the Doctrine. Real-time field notes, commentary, and SiteAI in action are on LinkedIn.
© 2026 Arkadiusz Janiszewski. SiteAI Ecosystem. All rights reserved. Built for the 1% of Managers who refuse to guess.
IDENTITY
Architect of SiteAI. Operational Resilience for Offshore Wind. Pragmatic AI for Complex Projects.