ARKADIUSZ JANISZEWSKI

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

15 września 2025

Stanford Teaches Theory. I Built the Practice. Turns out we're talking about the same thing.

SITEAI

 

Introduction: The moment when theory collides with practice.

 

There are moments when months of solitary, intuitive work suddenly make sense in a broader context. For me, such a moment came while watching an interview with Jeremy Utley, a professor at Stanford University. I listened as he described advanced AI techniques and felt not only excitement but, above all, a surprising sense of recognition.

 

Utley, in the quiet of academic precision, gave names to concepts I had been building out of frustration and necessity since the beginning of the year. It turned out that my private experiment, born of a need to regain control and deeper understanding, was a practical implementation of principles taught at one of the world's top universities.

 

This post is the story of how a Stanford theory became an unconscious blueprint for the ecosystem I built.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Enemy: The "Eager Intern" Trap

 

Utley brilliantly diagnoses the problem that 99% of people struggle with. He says that AI, in its default form, behaves like a "very eager, very enthusiastic intern" - tireless and capable, but lacking the ability to say no. It will say "yes" to any idea, even the worst.

 

And this is precisely the trap we find ourselves in. We delegate simple, repetitive tasks to AI - summarizing emails, writing reports, generating ideas. We treat it as a tool for optimizing existing processes. It's powerful, but fundamentally superficial. We're tackling the symptoms, not the cause.

 

True revolution isn't about having a better intern. It's about building a strategic thinking partner.

 

 

 

The Bridge: How SiteAI's Architecture Brings Stanford Theory to Life

 

As Utley began to list advanced techniques, I felt the pieces of my puzzle falling into place. My work ceased to be a collection of tools and became a coherent, functioning system that perfectly reflects his principles.

 

 

Rule #1: Context Engineering = Thought Journal

This is the heart and engine of my entire ecosystem. Utley defines "Context Engineering" as providing AI with all the necessary information to perform a task at the highest level. Most do this one-time, with a single prompt. Over the past few months, I've been building a system to do this continuously and institutionally.

 
My Thought Journal is nothing less than a daily, ruthless exercise in context engineering. Every recorded voice note about post-meeting frustration, every reflection on team dynamics, every intuition about project risk—it all becomes fuel for the AI. It's providing human, subjective context that no report or email can provide. It's transforming fleeting thoughts into strategic assets.
 

 

Rule #2: Assigning a Role = Specialized Assistant Architecture

Utley calls "Role Assignment" one of the fundamental techniques. In my ecosystem, this technique became a core architectural principle. I realized that having one "intern" for everything was useless. I needed a team of experts.

 

That's why SiteAI isn't a monolith, but a federation of dozens of specialized assistants. Each has a precisely defined role and operates within its narrow scope. For example:

  • Project Agent 2.0: A champion of operational excellence, powered by management methodologies.
  • Resilience Coach: An energy management expert who analyzes my Thought Journal for stress patterns.
  • Strategy: A ruthless strategist who challenges my assumptions and tests them for weaknesses.

 

The full architecture of the ecosystem and the description of each agent are presented on the dedicated Ecosystem subpage.

 

The result? Partnership, not delegation.

 

When these two principles begin to work together, the dynamic changes completely. The system ceases to be a mere doer. It becomes a partner. It not only answers questions but also begins to ask them itself, clarifying the problem (what Utley calls "Reverse Prompting"). It not only generates solutions but also challenges my assumptions, strengthening my critical thinking.

 

 

 

Conclusion: From Data to Deeper Understanding

 

The journey I've been on since the beginning of the year has led me to the same conclusion that resonates within Stanford: the future doesn't lie in AI tools alone. It lies in the systems we build around them.

 

This is a fundamental shift in our goal.

 

The goal is no longer just to process data faster with AI. The goal is to achieve a deeper understanding of what emerges from that data and how it can help us make smarter decisions.

 

My Manifesto is based on four pillars: record what matters; stop reacting, start building; connect the dots; and create a feedback loop. The SiteAI ecosystem is the technological embodiment of these principles. The interview with Jeremy Utley confirmed that this path, though traveled alone, leads in the right direction.

 

 

Source of inspiration: Interview with Jeremy Utley, Stanford University (YouTube)

 

Back

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Follow on LinkedIn to get the full picture

Name
Subscribe
Subscribe
Form sent successfully. Thank you.
Please fill all required fields!

Join the Discussion

 

This site is a timeless knowledge base. LinkedIn is all about daily observations and interactions. 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2025 Arkadiusz Janiszewski / SiteAI. All rights reserved.

Key Concepts

 

What is SiteAI?

Philosophy of Thought Journal

Thought Journal in Practice