ARKADIUSZ JANISZEWSKI
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
How to Get the Full Picture of Project?
PROJECT AGENT 2.0
How to See the Big Picture When Data Isn't Enough.
You join a project mid-project. A digital fortress awaits you: hundreds of emails, dozens of reports, endless chat threads. You feel the pressure to act quickly, but every step threatens to drown in information chaos. Where to begin?
Logic dictates: organize your data. Instead of wasting days on manual analysis, I assigned my Project Agent 2.0 a single task: "Analyze all documentation and create an onboarding plan for the first week."
In just a few dozen seconds, the Agent, powered by proven project management methodologies, prepared a perfect 5-day schedule.
- Monday: analysis of key documents.
- Tuesday and Wednesday: a series of meetings with stakeholders.
- Thursday: a workshop with the team.
- Friday: presentation of preliminary findings.
The plan was logical, complete, and provided a powerful sense of order. It was the illusion of control.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Action: Collecting Data That Is Not in the Reports
The plan on paper was one thing. The reality of the project was another. Throughout the week, my primary goal wasn't checking off tasks. It was listening.
During every meeting and every conversation, I focused not only on what was said, but above all, on what was left unsaid. Every note of frustration in a key engineer's voice, every suggestion made in the hallway, every observed inefficiency - all of it I immediately dictated as a voice note into my Thought Journal. I was collecting "soft data" - the human context that no project management system could capture.
Discovering the Truth: The Feedback Loop of Full Understanding
After a week, it was time for a face-to-face. I launched a process I call the Full Understanding Feedback Loop. I combined the hard design data with the subjective, human data from my Thought Journal.
The report I received was a moment of revelation. The hard data clearly showed: "Task X is two days late." Standard analysis would indicate a technical issue or poor time estimation.
However, the system connected this fact to my voice memo from Tuesday: "The team is frustrated by constant changes to the client's documentation. Engineers feel their work is being wasted and are losing motivation."
The conclusion was clear: the real cause of the delay was not a schedule issue, but the demotivation of key individuals. The illusion of control provided by the perfect plan had been shattered. The truth had emerged.
Conclusion: From Being in the Project to Understanding It
A good plan gets you started. But it's the synergy of hard data and a deep understanding of the human perspective that allows you to see the whole picture. This is the difference between being in the project and truly understanding it.
This is another example of how we achieve Full Understanding - whether on a weekly or project-wide scale.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Join the Discussion
This site is a timeless knowledge base. LinkedIn is all about daily observations and interactions.
© 2025 Arkadiusz Janiszewski / SiteAI. All rights reserved.
Key Concepts
What is SiteAI?
Philosophy of Thought Journal
Thought Journal in Practice